AccScience Publishing / IJB / Volume 10 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.36922/ijb.1963
Submit to IJB
Cite this article
27
Download
660
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluating the clinical benefit and acceptance of a bespoke 3D-printed splint for the treatment of mallet finger injury: A pilot study in a cohort of patients

Una M. Cronin1 ,  Aidan O’Sullivan1 ,  Margo Sheerin2 ,  Kevin J. O’Sullivan1 ,  Niamh M. Cummins3,4,5 ,  Damien Ryan6 ,  Leonard W. O’Sullivan1*
Show Less
1 Rapid Innovation Unit, Confirm Smart Manufacturing Centre & Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
2 Occupational Therapy Department, University Hospital Limerick Group, Nenagh General Hospital, Co., Tipperary, Ireland
3 School of Medicine, SLÁINTE Research and Education Alliance in General Practice, Primary Healthcare and Public Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
4 Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
5 Department of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
6 Emergency Department, ALERT Limerick EM Education Research Training, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
IJB 2024, 10(2), 1963 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1963
Submitted: 3 October 2023 | Accepted: 3 November 2023 | Published: 8 March 2024
© 2024 by the Author(s).. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Mallet finger injuries due to forced flexion of the distal interphalangeal joint represent a common reason for hospitalization. These injuries are primarily managed using generic Stack splints. The gold standard of care is custom splinting by a specialized hand therapist. However, this is not widely available due to staffing constraints. The aims of this study are to: (i) evaluate whether treating mallet finger injuries with a custom three-dimensional (3D)-printed splint is clinically beneficial, and (ii) assess patient and healthcare professional (HCP) acceptance and experience of bespoke 3D-printed mallet splints over generic splints. Ten adult patients with closed mallet finger injury were recruited in this study, which was conducted across three Injury Units in the University of Limerick Hospital Group (ULHG). Each patient’s injured finger was measured using calipers and subsequently fitted with a bespoke 3D-printed splint. Clinical benefit and acceptance of bespoke 3D-printed splints for the treatment of mallet finger injury was assessed. The results indicate that it is clinically advantageous to use a custom 3D-printed splint over a premolded generic splint. Out of the ten patients recruited, eight had successful outcomes based on the occupational therapist (OT) measurements using the Crawford classification scale. The results showed that 40% of patients scored excellent, 30% good, 30% fair, and 0% poor. In addition, in terms of patient and HCP acceptance of the splint, nine of the ten patients stated that they would use the 3D-printed custom splint again, if needed, in the future. In conclusion, a high level of patient and HCP acceptance signifies the clinical advantage of using 3D-printed splints. This pilot study shows that advances in 3D printing could make custom splinting a viable option for use in personalized healthcare.

Keywords
: Mallet finger
Mallet Injury
3D printing
Additive Manufacturing
Funding
This publication has emanated from research supported by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant Numbers SFI 16/RC/3918 co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund.
References
  1. Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury. 2008;39(12):1338-1344. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.021
  2. Xiao M, Yao Y, Fan C, et al. Multiple H-bonding chain extender-based polyurethane: ultrastiffness, hot-melt adhesion, and 3D printing finger orthosis. Chem Eng J. 2022;433:133260. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133260
  3. Bendre AA, Hartigan BJ, Kalainov DM. Mallet finger. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(5):336-344. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200509000-00007
  4. Khera BH, Chang C, Bhat W. An overview of mallet finger injuries. Acta Biomed. 2021;92(5):e2021246. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i5.11731
  5. Kleinbaum Y, Heyman Z, Ganel A, Blankstein A. Sonographic imaging of mallet finger. Ultraschall Med. 2005;26(03):223-226. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858165
  6. Griffin M, Hindocha S, Jordan D, Saleh M, Khan W. Management of extensor tendon injuries. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:36-42. doi: 10.2174/1874325001206010036
  7. Alla SR, Deal ND, Dempsey IJ. Current concepts: mallet finger. Hand. 2014;9(2):138-144. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9609-y
  8. Garberman SF, Diao E, Peimer CA. Mallet finger: results of early versus delayed closed treatment. J Hand Surg. 1994;19(5):850-852. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90200-3
  9. Güven E, Suner-Keklik S. Custom-made finger splint versus prefabricated finger splint: finger flexion stabilization. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2022;68(7):935-938. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220093
  10. Pike J, Mulpuri K, Metzger M, Ng G, Wells N, Goetz T. Blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing volar, dorsal, and custom thermoplastic splinting in treatment of acute mallet finger. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(4):580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.005
  11. O’Brien LJ, Bailey MJ. Single blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing dorsal aluminum and custom thermoplastic splints to stack splint for acute mallet finger. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(2):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.035
  12. Minchin P, Spirtos M. Investigation of the conservative management of mallet injury in Irish acute hospitals. Hand Ther. 2012;17(2):28-36. doi: 10.1258/ht.2012.012004
  13. Valdes K, Naughton N, Algar L. Conservative treatment of mallet finger: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2015;28(3):237-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.03.001
  14. Katzman B, Klein D, Mesa J, Geller J, Caligiuri D. Immobilization of the mallet finger: effects on the extensor tendon. J Hand Surg. 1999;24(1):80-84. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(99)90041-4
  15. Rayan GM, Mullins PT. Skin necrosis complicating mallet finger splinting and vascularity of the distal interphalangeal joint overlying skin. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12(4): 548-552. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(87)80206-x
  16. Vaz VM, Kumar L. 3D printing as a promising tool in personalized medicine. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021;22:1-20. doi: 10.1208/s12249-020-01905-8
  17. Kermavnar T, Shannon A, O’Sullivan KJ, McCarthy C, Dunne CP, O’Sullivan LW. Three-dimensional printing of medical devices used directly to treat patients: a systematic review. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2021;8(6):366-408. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2020.0324 
  18. Wong JY. On-site 3D printing of functional custom mallet splints for Mars analogue crewmembers. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015;86(10):911-914. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4259.2015
  19. Choi H, Seo A, Lee J. Mallet finger lattice casts using 3D printing. J Healthc Eng. 2019;2019:4765043. doi: 10.1155/2019/4765043
  20. Zolfagharian A, Gregory TM, Bodaghi M, Gharaie S, Fay P. Patient-specific 3D-printed splint for mallet finger injury. Int J Bioprint. 2020;6(2):259. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v6i2.259
  21. Papavasiliou T, Shah RK, Chatzimichail S, Uppal L, Chan JC. Three-dimensional printed customized adjustable mallet finger splint: a cheap, effective, and comfortable alternative. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(3):e3500. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003500
  22. Chhikara K, Gupta S, Saharawat S, Sarkar S, Chanda A. Design, manufacturing, and trial of a 3D printed customized finger splint for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumato. 2023;3(1):51-62. doi: 10.3390/rheumato3010004
  23. Nam H-S, Seo CH, Joo S-Y, Kim DH, Park D-S. The application of three-dimensional printed finger splints for Rehabil Med. 2018;42(4):634-638. doi: 10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.634
  24. Gupta A, Chaturvedi S, Bhat AK, Samheel M. Design and manufacture of customizable finger immobilizer and mallet finger splints. In: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Biomedical Innovations and Applications (BIA). IEEE; 2019:1-4. doi: 10.1109/BIA48344.2019.8967477
  25. Teoh T, Powell J, Kelly J, et al. Outcomes of point-of-care testing for influenza in the emergency department of a tertiary referral hospital in Ireland. J Hosp Infect. 2021;110:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.01.004
  26. Lamaris GA, Matthew MK. The diagnosis and management of mallet finger injuries. Hand. 2017;12(3):223-228. doi: 10.1177/1558944716642763
  27. Mezzio AJ, Valdes K. Determining patient satisfaction with an upper and lower extremity orthotic intervention using the QUEST 2.0: a systematic review. Technol Disabil. 2019;31(4):141-151. doi: 10.3233/TAD-190247
  28. Altan E, Alp NB, Baser R, Yalçın L. Soft-tissue mallet injuries: a comparison of early and delayed treatment. J Hand Surg. 2014;39(10):1982-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.140
  29. Shahrubudin N, Koshy P, Alipal J, Kadir M, Lee T. Challenges of 3D printing technology for manufacturing biomedical products: a case study of Malaysian manufacturing firms. Heliyon. 2020;6(4):e03734. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03734
  30. Patterson RM, Salatin B, Janson R, Salinas SP, Mullins MJS. A current snapshot of the state of 3D printing in hand rehabilitation. J Hand Ther. 2020;33(2):156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.018
  31. Willemsen K, Nizak R, Noordmans HJ, Castelein RM, Weinans H, Kruyt MC. Challenges in the design and regulatory approval of 3D-printed surgical implants: a two-case series. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1(4): e163-e171. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30067-6
  32. Kawalkar R, Dubey HK, Lokhande SP. A review for advancements in standardization for additive manufacturing. Mater Today Proc. 2022;50:1983-1990. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.333
  33. Clarke C, Friedman SM, Shi K, Arenovich T, Monzon J, Culligan C. Emergency department discharge instructions comprehension and compliance study. CJEM. 2005;7(1):5-11. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012860
  34. Engel KG, Buckley BA, Forth VE, et al. Patient understanding of emergency department discharge instructions: where are knowledge deficits greatest? Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(9):E1035-E1044. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01425.x  
  35. Hastings SN, Barrett A, Weinberger M, et al. Older patients’ understanding of emergency department discharge information and its relationship with adverse outcomes. J Patient Saf. 2011;7(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31820c7678
  36. Groth GN, Wilder DM, Young VL. The impact of cormpliance on the rehabilitation of patients with mallet finger injuries. J Hand Ther. 1994;7(1):21-24. doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(12)80037-8
  37. Waldburger L, Schaller R, Furthmüller C, Schrepfer L, Schaefer DJ, Kaempfen A. 3D-printed hand splints versus thermoplastic splints: a randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial. Int J Bioprint. 2022;8(1):474. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i1.474
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Share
Back to top
International Journal of Bioprinting, Electronic ISSN: 2424-8002 Print ISSN: 2424-7723, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept