AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EJMO026110126
Cite this article
4
Download
19
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Diagnostic accuracy of serum pepsinogens for detecting chronic atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Ganchimeg Dondov1,2 Bayarmaa Nyamaa1 Batbold Batsaikhan3 Tegshjargal Badamjav3 Sodnomtsogt Lkhagvasuren4 Tulgaa Lonjid3*
Show Less
1 Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
2 Department of Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Economy and Development, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Economy and Development, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
4 Department of Applied Neuroscience, Institute of Brain and Psychology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Received: 12 March 2026 | Revised: 13 May 2026 | Accepted: 19 May 2026 | Published online: 7 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that serological biomarkers such as pepsinogens may facilitate the early detection of gastric cancer.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum pepsinogen I (PGI) and the PGI/pepsinogen II ratio (PGR) in detecting gastric cancer and chronic atrophic gastritis.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using MeSH terms related to atrophic gastritis, gastric neoplasms, pepsinogen A, sensitivity, and specificity. Twenty-one eligible studies were included in the quantitative synthesis.

Results: For atrophic gastritis, the area under the curve was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–0.77) for PGI and 0.78 (95% CI = 0.75–0.82) for PGR. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 61.4% (95% CI = 48.2–73.2) and 86.4% (95% CI = 61.8–96.1), respectively, for PGI, and 72.4% (95% CI = 61.0–81.4) and 76.9% (95% CI = 49.5–91.9), respectively, for PGR. For gastric cancer detection, the area under the curve values were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.72–0.80) for PGI, 0.77 (95% CI = 0.73–0.80) for PGR, and 0.79 (95% CI = 0.75–0.83) for the combined PGI+PGR model. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 69.8% (95% CI = 55.0–81.3) and 70.8% (95% CI = 58.7–80.6), respectively, for PGI, 76.2% (95% CI = 65.4–84.2) and 66.1% (95% CI = 56.1–74.8), respectively, for PGR, and 61.5% (95% CI = 50.9–72.1) and 86.7% (95% CI = 79.4–94.1), respectively, for PGI+PGR.

Conclusion: Serum PGI and PGR can be used as an additional screening for high-risk subjects who may require gastroscopy or biopsy.

Keywords
Biomarkers for gastric cancer
Gastric cancer screening
Gastric precancerous conditions
Sensitivity of pepsinogen
Specificity of pepsinogen
Funding
The study was funded by the Mongolian Science and Technology Foundation (Grant No: ShUSUU-SNG-2025/15).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Balakrishnan M, George R, Sharma A, et al. Changing Trends in Stomach Cancer Throughout the World. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19(8). doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0575-8

 

  1. Lonjid T, Sambuu T, Tumurbat N, et al. Incidence of Stomach and Esophageal Cancers in Mongolia: Data from 2009 to 2018. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol. 2020;10(1):16-21. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1313

 

  1. World Health Organization. Global Cancer Registry. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home

 

  1. Hamashima C, Ogoshi K, Okamoto M, et al. A community-based, case-control study evaluating mortality reduction from gastric cancer by endoscopic screening in Japan. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079088

 

  1. Correa P, Piazuelo MB. The gastric precancerous cascade. J Dig Dis. 2011;13(1):2-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00550.x

 

  1. Chiba T, Marusawa H, Seno H, et al. Mechanism for gastric cancer development by Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(8pt1):1175-1181. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05472.x

 

  1. Battista S, Ambrosio MR, Limarzi F, et al. Molecular Alterations in Gastric Preneoplastic Lesions and Early Gastric Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(13):6652. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136652

 

  1. Akbari A, Ashtari S, Tabaiean SP, et al. Overview of epidemiological characteristics, clinical features, and risk factors of gastric cancer in Asia-Pacific region. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol. 2022;18(6):493-505. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13654

 

  1. Chapelle N, Petryszyn P, Blin J, et al. A panel of stomach-specific biomarkers (GastroPanel®) for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis: A prospective, multicenter study in a low gastric cancer incidence area. Helicobacter. 2020;25(5). doi: 10.1111/hel.12727

 

  1. Liu L, Deng W. Gastric Cancer: Innovations in Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment. J Pers Med. 2023;13(1):127. doi: 10.3390/jpm13010127

 

  1. Jiang T, Mei L, Yang X, et al. Biomarkers of gastric cancer: current advancement. Heliyon. 2022;8(10):e10899. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10899

 

  1. Tu H, Sun L, Dong X, et al. A Serological Biopsy Using Five Stomach-Specific Circulating Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Risk Assessment: A Multi-Phase Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(5):704-715. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.55

 

  1. Romańczyk M, Osmola M, Link A, et al. Non-Invasive Markers for the Detection of Gastric Precancerous Conditions. Cancers. 2024;16(12):2254. doi: 10.3390/cancers16122254

 

  1. Zhang T, Zhou X, Meng X, et al. The potential value of serum pepsinogen and gastrin-17 for the diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis at different stages of severity: a clinical diagnostic study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025;25(1). doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03996-8

 

  1. Castro C, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rodrigues ANG, et al. Western long-term accuracy of serum pepsinogen-based gastric cancer screening. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(3):274-277. doi: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001040

 

  1. Dondov G, Amarbayasgalan D, Batsaikhan B, et al. Diagnostic performances of pepsinogens and gastrin-17 for atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer in Mongolian subjects. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0274938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274938

 

  1. Gantuya B, Bolor D, Oyuntsetseg K, et al. New observations regarding Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer in Mongolia. Helicobacter. 2018;23(4). doi: 10.1111/hel.12491

 

  1. Hamashima C, Sasazuki S, Inoue M, et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of prediction for gastric cancer development using serum pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori antibody tests. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3173-0

 

  1. In H, Adams A, Ho S, et al. Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori: Serum biomarkers for gastric cancer risk in a diverse United States population. Surg Oncol Insight. 2024;1(3):100086. doi: 10.1016/j.soi.2024.100086

 

  1. Juan Cai W, Yin L, Kang Q, et al. The Serum Pepsinogen Test as a Predictor of Kazakh Gastric Cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). doi: 10.1038/srep43536

 

  1. Kim JR, Lee K, Jung WT, et al. Validity of serum pepsinogen levels and quininium resin test combined for gastric cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev. 2005;29(6):570-575. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.07.005

 

  1. Kitahara F, Kobayashi K, Sato T, et al. Accuracy of screening for gastric cancer using serum pepsinogen concentrations. Gut. 1999;44(5):693-697. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.5.693

 

  1. Koivurova OP, Koskela R, Blomster T, et al. Serological Biomarker Panel in Diagnosis of Atrophic Gastritis and Helicobacter pylori Infection in Gastroscopy Referral Patients: Clinical Validation of the New-Generation GastroPanel(®) Test. Anticancer Res. 2021;41(11):5527-5537. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15366

 

  1. Kurilovich S, Belkovets A, Reshetnikov O, et al. Stomach-specific Biomarkers (GastroPanel) Can Predict the Development of Gastric Cancer in a Caucasian Population: A Longitudinal Nested Case-Control Study in Siberia. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(1):247-253.

 

  1. Lee JY, Park KS, Lee HG, et al. Comparison of serum trefoil factor 3 with the pepsinogen test for the screening of diffuse-type gastric cancer. Clin Exp Med. 2017;17(3):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s10238-016-0426-1

 

  1. Mizuno S, Kobayashi M, Tomita S, et al. Validation of the pepsinogen test method for gastric cancer screening using a follow-up study. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(3):158-163. doi: 10.1007/s10120-009-0522-y

 

  1. Nejadi-Kelarijani F, Roshandel G, Semnani S, et al. Diagnostic values of serum levels of pepsinogens and gastrin-17 for screening gastritis and gastric cancer in a high risk area in northern Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(17):7433-7436. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.17.7433

 

  1. Oishi Y, Kiyohara Y, Kubo M, et al. The serum pepsinogen test as a predictor of gastric cancer: the Hisayama study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(7):629-637. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj088

 

  1. Shafaghi A, Mansour-Ghanaei F, Joukar F, et al. Serum gastrin and the pepsinogen I/II ratio as markers for diagnosis of premalignant gastric lesions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(6):3931-3936. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.6.3931

 

  1. Shikata K, Ninomiya T, Yonemoto K, et al. Optimal cutoff value of the serum pepsinogen level for prediction of gastric cancer incidence: the Hisayama Study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(6):669-675. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.658855

 

  1. Trivanovic D, Plestina S, Honovic L, et al. Gastric cancer detection using the serum pepsinogen test method. Tumori. 2021;108(4):386-391. doi: 10.1177/03008916211014961

 

  1. Wang Y, Zhu Z, Liu Z, et al. Diagnostic value of serum pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, and gastrin-17 levels for population-based screening for early-stage gastric cancer. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(3). doi: 10.1177/0300060520914826

 

  1. Yakut M, Örmeci N, Erdal H, et al. The association between precancerous gastric lesions and serum pepsinogens, serum gastrin, vascular endothelial growth factor, serum interleukin-1 Beta, serum toll-like receptor-4 levels and Helicobacter pylori Cag A status. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37(3):302-311. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2012.09.013

 

  1. Zhang XM, Li JX, Zhang GY, et al. The value of serum pepsinogen levels for the diagnosis of gastric diseases in Chinese Han people in midsouth China. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-230x-14-3

 

  1. Burke E, Harkins P, Arumugasamy M. Incidence of Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Those With Gastric Atrophy: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e71768. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71768

 

  1. Song JH, Kim SG, Jin EH, et al. Risk Factors for Gastric Tumorigenesis in Underlying Gastric Mucosal Atrophy. Gut Liver. 2017;11(5):612-619. doi: 10.5009/gnl16488

 

  1. Bang CS, Lee JJ, Baik GH. Prediction of Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Gastric Neoplasms by Serum Pepsinogen Assay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. J Clin Med. 2019;8(5):657. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050657

 

  1. Zagari RM, Rabitti S, Greenwood DC, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: diagnostic performance of the combination of pepsinogen, gastrin-17 and anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies serum assays for the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(7):657-667. doi: 10.1111/apt.14248

 

  1. Zhao J, Tian W, Zhang X, et al. The diagnostic value of serum trefoil factor 3 and pepsinogen combination in chronic atrophic gastritis: a retrospective study based on a gastric cancer screening cohort in the community population. Biomarkers. 2024;29(6):384-392. doi: 10.1080/1354750x.2024.2400927

 

  1. Eun Bae S, Hoon Lee J, Soo Park Y, et al. Decrease of serum total ghrelin in extensive atrophic gastritis: comparison with pepsinogens in histological reference. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(2):137-144. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1083049

 

  1. Qin Y, Geng JX, Huang B. Clinical value of serum pepsinogen in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric diseases. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023;15(7):1174-1181. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i7.1174

 

  1. Huang YK, Yu JC, Kang WM, et al. Significance of Serum Pepsinogens as a Biomarker for Gastric Cancer and Atrophic Gastritis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142080

 

  1. Lorente S, Doiz O, Trinidad Serrano M, et al. Helicobacter pylori stimulates pepsinogen secretion from isolated human peptic cells. Gut. 2002;50(1):13-18. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.1.13

 

  1. Tong Y, Wang H, Zhao Y, et al. Serum pepsinogen levels in different regions of China and its influencing factors: a multicenter cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1). doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01794-6

 

  1. Xiao M, Zhang Z, Liao G, et al. Analysis of the Value of Helicobacter pylori Test in Combination with the Determination of Plasma Propepsin and Gastrin 17 in Screening the Precancerous Status of Gastric Cancer. Cell Mol Biol. 2022;68(8):110-115. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2022.68.8.20

 

  1. Lenti MV, Miceli E, Lahner E, et al. Distinguishing Features of Autoimmune Gastritis Depending on Previous Helicobacter pylori Infection or Positivity to Anti-Parietal Cell Antibodies: Results From the Autoimmune gastRitis Italian netwOrk Study grOup (ARIOSO). Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(12):2408-2417. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002948

 

  1. Staynova R, Andonova D. Medicinal products under additional monitoring: a comparative analysis of market access. Folia Med. 2025;67(3). doi: 10.3897/folmed.67.e151128
Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing