AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EJMO025490504
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Development and validation of the Physical Activity Intention Scale for Children and Adolescents with Cancer

Dongyu Song1,2 Jing Zheng1 Xiaoming Zhou1 Jingran Lyu2 Ziying Song3 Yuli Li2*
Show Less
1 Intensive Care Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
2 School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Qilu Medical College, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
3 College of Stomatology, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China
Received: 3 December 2025 | Revised: 9 April 2026 | Accepted: 21 April 2026 | Published online: 19 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nursing Care in Cancer)
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Introduction: Physical activity benefits children and adolescents with cancer, improving well-being and reducing complications, yet participation remains insufficient.

Objective: This study develops and validates the Physical Activity Intention Scale for Children and Adolescents with Cancer (PAISCAC) to assess participation within this population.

Methods: Based on the theory of planned behavior, an initial item pool was generated through literature review, expert consultation, and a preliminary survey. From November 2022 to June 2023, 440 children and adolescents aged 6–16 years with cancer were recruited through convenience sampling. The reliability and validity of the scale were assessed through item analysis, validity analysis, and reliability analysis.

Results: The scale consisted of 16 items across four dimensions: attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention. All items were significantly correlated with the total score (r = 0.458–0.866, p < 0.05), and significant differences were observed between high- and low-scoring groups (p < 0.05). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 2.985, root mean square error of approximation = 0.094, Normed Fit Index = 0.912, Incremental Fit Index = 0.940, Tucker–Lewis Index = 0.922, and Comparative Fit Index = 0.939). Composite reliability ranged from 0.714 to 0.955, while average variance extracted ranged from 0.423 to 0.876. The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.935, with the dimensions of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention yielding coefficients of 0.949, 0.818, 0.791, and 0.909, respectively.

Conclusion: The PAISCAC demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity and can be used as a reliable instrument to assess physical activity intention among children and adolescents with cancer.

Keywords
Children
Adolescents
Cancer
Physical Activity Intention Scale
Reliability
Validity
Theory of planned behavior
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
References
  1. Steliarova-Foucher E, Colombet M, Ries LAG, et al. International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001- 10: a population-based registry study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(6):719-731. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30186-9
  2. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75(1):10-45. doi: 10.3322/caac.21871
  3. Geenen MM, Cardous-Ubbink MC, Kremer LC, et al. Medical assessment of adverse health outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA. 2007;297(24):2705-2715. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.24.2705
  4. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA. Chronic Health Conditions in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. Oncology Times. 2007;29(1):26. doi: 10.1097/01.COT.0000265629.30194.8e
  5. Bernal JDK, Recchia F, Yu DJ, et al. Physical activity and exercise for cancer-related cognitive impairment among individuals affected by childhood cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023;7(1):47-58. doi: 10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00286-3
  6. Van der Looven R, De Vos E, Vandekerckhove K, Coomans I, Laureys G, Dhooge C. Efficacy of interdisciplinary rehabilitation in child cancer survivors: Impact on physical fitness, fatigue and body composition after 1-year follow-up. Eur J Cancer Care. 2022;31(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.13761
  7. Bratteteig M, Anderssen SA, Rueegg CS, et al. Device-measured physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk in adolescent childhood cancer survivors. A physical activity in childhood cancer survivors (PACCS) study. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:977365. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.977365
  8. Ha L, Wakefield CE, Fardell J, et al. Parent perceptions of their child’s and their own physical activity after treatment for childhood cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30(11):8947- 8957. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07288-9
  9. Van Dijk-Lokkart EM, Steur LMH, Braam KI, et al. Longitudinal development of cancer-related fatigue and physical activity in childhood cancer patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66(12). doi: 10.1002/pbc.27949
  10. Devine KA, Mertens AC, Whitton JA, et al. Factors associated with physical activity among adolescent and young adult survivors of early childhood cancer: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study (CCSS). Psychooncology. 2018;27(2):613-619. doi: 10.1002/pon.4528
  11. Fidler MM, Reulen RC, Winter DL, et al. Long term cause specific mortality among 34 489 five year survivors of childhood cancer in Great Britain: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2016;354:i4351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4351
  12. Scott J, Li N, Liu Q, et al. Association of exercise with late mortality in adult survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15_suppl):10512. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.10512
  13. Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  14. Kang Q. The analysis on leisure time moderate and vigorous physical activity of children aged 7-15 in Shanghai based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Master’s thesis. Shanghai University of Sports; 2016.
  15. Sun L. Liaoning University students’ physical exercise behavior and its influencing mechanism under the Theory of Planned Behavior. Master’s thesis. Liaoning Normal University; 2022.
  16. Keats MR, Culos-Reed SN, Courneya KS, Mcbride M. Understanding physical activity in adolescent cancer survivors: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychooncology. 2010;16(5):448-457. doi: 10.1002/pon.1075
  17. Caru M, Curnier D, Levesque A, et al. The impact of cancer on theory of planned behavior measures and physical activity levels during the first weeks following cancer diagnosis in children. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(2):823-831. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05541-7
  18. Sur MH, Jung J, Shapiro DR. Theory of planned behavior to promote physical activity of adults with physical disabilities: Meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Disabil Health J. 2022;15(1):101199. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101199
  19. Cuy Castellanos D, Daprano CM, Blevins C, Crecelius A. The theory of planned behavior and strength training in college-aged women. J Am Coll Health. 2022;70(3):837-842. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1775606
  20. Battanta N, Lange K, Kesting SV, et al. Supervised Physical Activity Interventions in Children and Adolescents with Cancer Undergoing Treatment—A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol. 2025;32(4):234. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32040234
  21. Schmidt-Andersen P, Boensvang NN, Pouplier A, et al. Exploring Motivation for Engaging in Exercise During the First Six Months of Childhood Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2025;2025(1). doi: 10.1155/ecc/8305173
  22. Chan SWW, Chien CW, Wong AYL, Pang MYC. Translation and psychometric validation of the traditional Chinese version of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pediatric-25 Profile version 2.0 (PROMIS-25) in Chinese Children with Cancer in Hong Kong. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(6):1779-1791. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02759-8
  23. Francis J, Eccles MP, Johnston M, et al. Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research. University of Newcastle Upon Tyne; 2004.
  24. Kang X, Wang LJ. Influencing factors of adolescents’ leisure time physical activity based on the theory of planned behavior. Chin J Sch Health. 2016;37(6):851-855. doi: 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2016.06.013
  25. Zhang L, Mao Z. Handbook of Commonly Used Psychological Scales in Sports Science. Beijing: Beijing Sport University Press; 2004.
  26. Li Z, Liu Y. Nursing Research Methods. 2nd ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2018.
  27. Li M. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Software AMOS and Its Application in Test Development. Newark: Psychological Publishing Co., Ltd.; 2006.
  28. Zeng G. Modern Epidemiological Methods and Applications. Beijing: Beijing Medical University & Peking Union Medical College Joint Publishing House; 1994.
  29. Kendall MG. Multivariate Analysis. 2nd ed. Busan: Griffin; 1957.
  30. Boomsma A. Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in lisrel maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika. 1985;50(2):229-242. doi: 10.1007/BF02294248
  31. Xia Y, Yang Y. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behav Res Methods. 2019;51(1):409-428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
  32. Bacon D, Sauer P, Young M. Composite Reliability in Structural Equations Modeling. Educ Psychol Meas. 1995;55(3):394-406. doi: 10.1177/0013164495055003003
  33. Dimitri P, Joshi K, Jones N. Moving more: physical activity and its positive effects on long term conditions in children and young people. Arch Dis Child. 2020;105(11):1035-1040. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318017
  34. Singh B, Bennett H, Miatke A, et al. Systematic Umbrella Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of Physical Activity in Improving Depression and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2026;65(2):171-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2025.04.007
  35. Zheng J, Zhou X, Cai R, Yu R, Tang D, Liu K. Dietary behaviours, physical activity and quality of life among childhood cancer survivors in Mainland China: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2021;30(1):e13342. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13342
  36. Zheng J, Zhou X, Cai R, Liu Q, Yu R, Liu K. Individual, Interpersonal, and Home Environmental Factors Influencing Health Behaviors Among Chinese Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Structural Equation Analysis. Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(2):E604-E613. doi: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000991
  37. Youngcharoen P, Vincent C, Park CG. Theory of Planned Behavior Constructs Associated with Nurses’ Pain Assessment and Pro Re Nata (PRN) Opioid Analgesic Administration: A Cross-sectional Study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2017;18(3):153-169. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2017.03.001
  38. Andrés-Jensen L, Larsen HB, Johansen C, Frandsen TL, Schmiegelow K, Wahlberg A. Everyday life challenges among adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: An in-depth qualitative study. Psychooncology. 2020;29(10):1630-1637. doi: 10.1002/pon.5480
  39. Wang MJ, Dzifa KL, Lei J, Kan X, Zhang RX. The experiences of children and adolescents with cancer returning to school: A qualitative meta-synthesis. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024;76:140- 149. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.02.014
  40. Ji W, Shen J, Yang B, et al. Annual Report on the Internet Use of Chinese Minors (2021). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press; 2021.
  41. Zheng R. Psychological Measurement and Testing. Beijing: China Renmin University Press; 2008.
Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing