AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EJMO026020015
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Efficacy and safety of the combination of PEG–rhG-CSF with camrelizumab and chemotherapy in advanced squamous nonsmall cell lung cancer: A randomized controlled trial

Tong Zhao1 Tingting Zhu1 Lei Chen1 Weike Zhang1*
Show Less
1 Department of Oncology, The Eighth People’s Hospital of Jinan City, Jinan, Shandong, China
Received: 9 January 2026 | Revised: 15 April 2026 | Accepted: 22 April 2026 | Published online: 19 May 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Introduction: Optimizing first-line chemoimmunotherapy for advanced squamous non–small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) remains challenging, particularly in balancing efficacy with treatment-related hematologic toxicity.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether adding polyethylene glycol–recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG–rhG-CSF) to first-line camrelizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with advanced sqNSCLC.

Methods: In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, 212 patients with treatment–naïve stage IV sqNSCLC were enrolled between 2020 and 2021. Among them, 23 were lost to follow-up, leaving 189 patients included in the study. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either camrelizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (control group, n = 94) or the same regimen plus prophylactic PEG–rhG-CSF (experimental group, n = 95). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: Among the evaluable patients, the ORR was significantly higher in the experimental group (58.95% vs. 43.62%; p = 0.0355). The disease control rate was comparable between groups (85.26% vs. 76.60%; p = 0.2431). The experimental group demonstrated significantly longer median PFS (10.5 vs. 8.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.99; p = 0.0423) and a strong trend toward improved median OS (not reached vs. 22.3 months; HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–0.99; p = 0.0432). Survival benefit was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The incidence of neutropenia was significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.0001), while fever was more common (p = 0.0256). Other adverse events were similar between groups.

Conclusion: The addition of PEG–rhG-CSF to first-line camrelizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy in advanced sqNSCLC significantly improved tumor response and PFS, showed a promising OS benefit, reduced chemotherapy–induced neutropenia, and maintained a manageable safety profile. These findings suggest a potential synergistic role for PEG–rhG–CSF beyond supportive care in this setting.

Keywords
Polyethylene glycol–recombinant human granulocyte colony–stimulating factor
Camrelizumab
Advanced squamous non–small cell lung cancer
Immunotherapy
Chemotherapy
Funding
This study received financial support from the Research Project on Supporting Treatment for Emerging Tumors in China, specifically under the project titled “Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Polyethylene Glycolated Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Stimulating Factor or Placebo Combined with Camrelizumab, Paclitaxel, and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer” (cphcf-2022-011).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Ren S, Chen J, Xu X, et al. Camrelizumab Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Squamous NSCLC (CameL-Sq): A Phase 3 Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2022;17(4):544-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.11.018
  2. Vesely MD, Zhang T, Chen L. Resistance Mechanisms to Anti-PD Cancer Immunotherapy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2022;40:45-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-070621-030155
  3. Giles JR, Ngiow SF, Manne S, Baxter AE, Khan O, Wang P. Shared and distinct biological circuits in effector, memory and exhausted CD8+ T cells revealed by temporal single-cell transcriptomics and epigenetics. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(11):1600-1613. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01338-4
  4. Xiong H, Mittman S, Rodriguez R, et al. Coexpression of Inhibitory Receptors Enriches for Activated and Functional CD8+ T Cells in Murine Syngeneic Tumor Models. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(6):963-976. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0750
  5. Varayathu H, Sarathy V, Thomas BE, Mufti SS, Naik R. Combination Strategies to Augment Immune Check Point Inhibitors Efficacy - Implications for Translational Research. Front Oncol. 2021;11:559161. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.559161
  6. Zhu S, Zhang T, Zheng L, et al. Combination strategies to maximize the benefits of cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01164-5
  7. Sun J, Bai H, Wang Z, et al. Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor regulates the immune status of patients with small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11(3):713-722. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13322
  8. Li W, Dong M, Huang S, et al. Efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF in preventing chemoradiotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Biomol Biomed. 2023;23(2):310-316. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2022.7859
  9. Mouchemore KA, Anderson RL. Immunomodulatory effects of G-CSF in cancer: Therapeutic implications. Semin Immunol. 2021;54:101512. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2021.101512
  10. Kang S, Mansurov A, Kurtanich T, et al. Engineered GM-CSF polarizes protumorigenic tumor-associated macrophages to an antitumorigenic phenotype and potently synergizes with IL-12 immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2024;12(12):e009541. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009541
  11. Takada R, Toritsuka M, Yamauchi T, et al. Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced macrophages of individuals with autism spectrum disorder adversely affect neuronal dendrites through the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Mol Autism. 2024;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00589-2
  12. You J, Yuan Y, Gu X, Wang W, Li X. Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a prospective study. BMC Cancer. 2024;24(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12556-4
  13. Ma H, Zhu X, Gao L, Zhong X, Zhong B. Effect of PEG-rhG-CSF on primary prevention of neutropenia after simultaneous radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Minerva Surg. 2023;78(3):309-310. doi: 10.23736/s2724-5691.21.09391-6
  14. Sun L, Tian Y, Zhang S, Huang L, Ma J, Han C. Impact of Prophylactic Use of PEG-rhG-CSF on First-Line Immunochemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC: A Cohort Study. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024;6(2):100780. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100780
  15. Freites-Martinez A, Santana N, Arias-Santiago S, Viera A. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2021;112(1):90-92. [In Spanish] doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009
  16. Reck M, Remon J, Hellmann MD. First-Line Immunotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(6):586-597. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01497
  17. Bagchi S, Yuan R, Engleman EG. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer: Clinical Impact and Mechanisms of Response and Resistance. Annu Rev Pathol. 2021;16:223-249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042020-042741
  18. Wang Z, Wu X. Study and analysis of antitumor resistance mechanism of PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blocker. Cancer Med. 2020;9(21):8086-8121. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3410
  19. Cui JW, Li Y, Yang Y, et al. Tumor immunotherapy resistance: Revealing the mechanism of PD-1 / PD-L1-mediated tumor immune escape. Biomed Pharm. 2024;171:116203. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116203
  20. Belk JA, Daniel B, Satpathy AT. Epigenetic regulation of T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(6):848-860. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01224-z
  21. Budimir N, Thomas GD, Dolina JS, Salek-Ardakani S. Reversing T-cell Exhaustion in Cancer: Lessons Learned from PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cancer Immunol Res. 2022;10(2):146-153. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-21-0515
  22. Khan O, Giles JR, McDonald S, et al. TOX transcriptionally and epigenetically programs CD8+ T cell exhaustion. Nature. 2019;571(7764):211-218. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1325-x
  23. Wu M, Huang Q, Xie Y, et al. Improvement of the anticancer efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade via combination therapy and PD-L1 regulation. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01242-2
  24. Galluzzi L, Humeau J, Buqué A, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(12):725-741. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0413-z
  25. Chen Y, Gao GF, Tan S. Yi T xibao shouti wei jichu de mianyi liaofa yanjiu jinzhan [T cell receptor-based immunotherapy: a review]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2023;39(10):4004- 4028. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.230295
  26. Duan Z, Ho M. T-Cell Receptor Mimic Antibodies for Cancer Immunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(9):1533- 1541. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0115
  27. Baulu E, Gardet C, Chuvin N, Depil S. TCR-engineered T cell therapy in solid tumors: State of the art and perspectives. Sci Adv. 2023;9(7):eadf3700. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf3700
  28. Zhao T, Wang Y, Zhou D, Zhang W. Effects of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on lymphocytes and white blood cells of patients with malignant tumor. Open Life Sci. 2023;18(1):20220590. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0590
  29. Galletti G, De Simone G, Mazza EMC, et al. Two subsets of stem-like CD8+ memory T cell progenitors with distinct fate commitments in humans. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(12):1552- 1562. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0791-5
  30. Desai A, Peters S. Immunotherapy-based combinations in metastatic NSCLC. Cancer Treat Rev. 2023;116:102545. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102545
  31. Petty WJ, Paz-Ares L. Emerging Strategies for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(3):419-429. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5631
  32. Shuyue G, Jiamin C, Niansong Q. Lymphocyte subsets and inflammatory factors as predictors of immunotherapy efficacy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):22480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49810-x
  33. Kim TK, Vandsemb EN, Herbst RS, Chen L. Adaptive immune resistance at the tumour site: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(7):529-540. doi: 10.1038/s41573-022-00493-5
  34. Morgensztern D, Ko A, O’Brien M, et al. Association between depth of response and survival in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy. Cancer. 2019;125(14):2394-2399. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32114
  35. McCoach CE, Blumenthal GM, Zhang L, et al. Exploratory analysis of the association of depth of response and survival in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with a targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2707-2714. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx414
  36. Lennartz S, Nelles C, Persigehl T. iRECIST: Response- Assessment von Immuntherapien [iRECIST: assessment of immunotherapy response]. Radiologie. 2026;66(1):18-23. [In German] doi: 10.1007/s00117-025-01552-9
  37. Borcoman E, Kanjanapan Y, Champiat S, et al. Novel patterns of response under immunotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(3):385-396. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz003
  38. Zdrenka M, Kowalewski A, Ahmadi N, et al. Refining PD-1/ PD-L1 assessment for biomarker-guided immunotherapy: A review. Biomol Biomed. 2024;24(1):14-29. doi: 10.17305/bb.2023.9265
  39. Becker PS, Griffiths EA, Alwan LM, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hematopoietic Growth Factors, Version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(1):12-22. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0002
  40. Wang C, Zhu S, Miao C, et al. Safety and efficacy of PEGylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective, cohort-controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09644-8
  41. Huang W, Liu J, Zeng Y, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of polyethylene glycol recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of neutropenia after chemotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;82(4):607-613. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3639-z
  42. Cossey J, Cote MCB. Evaluation and management of febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer. JAAPA. 2024;37(8):16- 20. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000054
  43. Wang J, Li B. Chinese expert consensus on the application of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (2023 edition). Precis Radiat Oncol. 2023;7(3):150-159. [In Chinese] doi: 10.1002/pro6.1201
  44. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359(6382):1350-1355. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4060
  45. Santomasso BD, Nastoupil LJ, Adkins S, et al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(35):3978-3992. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01992
  46. Zitvogel L, Tesniere A, Kroemer G. Cancer despite immunosurveillance: immunoselection and immunosubversion. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(10):715-727. doi: 10.1038/nri1936
Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing