AccScience Publishing / EJMO / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EJMO025110054
Submit to EJMO
Cite this article
5
Download
30
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
Forthcoming Issue
Current Issue
View All
News and Announcements
View All
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Psychotherapists’ perspectives on the quality of psychological services for cancer patients in Riyadh: A predictive study

Yahya Khatatbeh*
Show Less
1 Department of Psychology, College of Social Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
EJMO, 025110054 https://doi.org/10.36922/EJMO025110054
Received: 13 March 2025 | Revised: 29 April 2025 | Accepted: 12 May 2025 | Published online: 20 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nursing Care in Cancer)
© 2025 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Download PDF
Cite
XML
Abstract

Introduction: Psychological services play a vital role in supporting cancer patients, yet their quality is influenced by provider-related factors that remain underexplored. Objective: The objective of this study was to predict the quality of psychological services provided to cancer patients in Riyadh from the perspective of psychotherapists and to assess the predictive value of key variables within the target group. Methods: A questionnaire assessing communication skills scale and psychotherapist competence was completed by 329 psychotherapists. Results: Our findings revealed that the highest mean score was observed for the empathy dimension (54.20), whereas respect and authenticity recorded the lowest mean score (19.28). The overall quality of psychological services had a mean score of 174.88 ± 9.53. Regarding the psychotherapist self-efficacy scale, clinical competence recorded the highest mean (20.41), whereas influence regulation had the lowest mean score (7.95). The total score for psychotherapist competence was 79.33. Predictive analysis revealed that the workplace and academic level of psychotherapists were statistically significant predictors of service quality (p<0.05). The independent variables accounted for 41% of the variance in psychotherapist competence and 16% of the variance in communication skills with patients, indicating an overall weak predictive relationship. Conclusion: Clinical practice implications should be considered. The identified predictors—communication skills, workplace, and academic level—may guide future efforts to enhance therapeutic approaches. Focusing on improving empathy and emotional regulation could further strengthen the quality of psychological care for cancer patients. Further studies are encouraged to translate these findings into practical clinical strategies.

Keywords
Psychological services
Cancer patients
Riyadh
Psychotherapists
Predictive study
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

 

  1. Remon J, Reguart N, García-Campelo R, et al. Lung cancer in Spain. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.09.026

 

  1. Bergerot C, Jacobsen PB, Rosa WE, et al. Global unmet psychosocial needs in cancer care: Health policy. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;78:102942. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102942

 

  1. O’Hea EL, Monahan BR, Cutillo A, et al. Predictors of psychological distress and interest in mental health services in individuals with cancer. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(6): 1145-1156. doi: 10.1177/1359105314547752

 

  1. Smith AD. Improving Therapeutic Communication Skills Through an End-of-Life Simulation. Massachusetts: Regis College; 2023.

 

  1. Ridley PE. Discovering Counseling Methods that Military Chaplains can Use to Increase Spiritual Resilience. [Doctoral Thesis, Bethel University]. Spark Repository; 2020.

 

  1. Schellekens MPJ, Wolvers MDJ, Schroevers MJ, Bootsma TI, Cramer AOJ, van der Lee ML. Exploring the interconnectedness of fatigue, depression, anxiety and potential risk and protective factors in cancer patients: A network approach. J Behav Med. 2020;43:553-563. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00084-7

 

  1. Davies F, Shepherd HL, Beatty L, Clark B, Butow P, Shaw J. Implementing web-based therapy in routine mental health care: Systematic review of health professionals’ perspectives. J Med Intern Res. 2020;22(7):e17362. doi: 10.2196/17362

 

  1. Ruiz-Rodríguez I, Hombrados-Mendieta I, Melguizo- Garín A, Martos-Méndez MJ. The importance of social support, optimism and resilience on the quality of life of cancer patients. Front Psychol. 2022;13:833176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833176

 

  1. Koutsouleris N, Hauser TU, Skvortsova V, De Choudhury M. From promise to practice: Towards the realisation of AI-informed mental health care. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e829-40. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00153-4

 

  1. Harnischfeger N, Rath HM, Alt-Epping B, et al. Effects of a communication training for oncologists on early addressing palliative and end-of-life care in advanced cancer care (PALLI-COM): A randomized, controlled trial. ESMO Open. 2022;7(6):100623. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100623

 

  1. Flock C, Grapp M, Oldsen R, Friederich HC, Bugaj TJ. Therapeutic alliance in psycho‐oncology: A systematic review. Couns Psychother Res. 2024;24(4):1149-1167. doi: 10.1002/capr.12717

 

  1. Akechi T, Ito Y, Ogawa A, Kizawa Y. Essential competences for psychologists in palliative cancer care teams. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021;51(10):1587-1594. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab133

 

  1. Bognár SA, Teutsch B, Bunduc S, et al. Psychological intervention improves quality of life in patients with early-stage cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):13233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63431-y

 

  1. Broadbridge E, Greene K, Venetis MK, et al. Facilitating psychological adjustment for breast cancer patients through empathic communication and uncertainty reduction. Patient Educ Couns. 2023;114:107791. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107791

 

  1. Sabetfar N, Meschi F, Hosseinzade Taghvaei M. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based group therapy on perceived stress, emotional cognitive regulation, and self-care behaviors in patients with hypertension. Intern Med Today. 2021;27(2):246-263.

 

  1. Power N, Noble LA, Simmonds-Buckley M, et al. Associations between treatment adherence-competence-integrity (ACI) and adult psychotherapy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022;90(5):427-445. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000736

 

  1. Goldberg SB, Flemotomos N, Martinez VR, et al. Machine learning and natural language processing in psychotherapy research: Alliance as example use case. J Couns Psychol. 2020;67(4):438-448. doi: 10.1037/cou0000382

 

  1. Van Heerden AC, Pozuelo JR, Kohrt BA. Global mental health services and the impact of artificial intelligence-powered large language models. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023;80(7):662-664. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.1253

 

  1. Wampold BE, Flückiger C. The alliance in mental health care: Conceptualization, evidence and clinical applications. World Psychiatry. 2023;22(1):25-41. doi: 10.1002/wps.21035

 

  1. Zhang Y, Cui C, Wang Y, Wang L. Effects of stigma, hope and social support on quality of life among Chinese patients diagnosed with oral cancer: A cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18:112. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01353-9

 

  1. Benuto LT, Singer J, Newlands RT, Casas JB. Training culturally competent psychologists: Where are we and where do we need to go? Train Educ Profess Psychol. 2019;13(1):56.

 

  1. Whittingham M, Marmarosh ML, Mallow P, Scherer M. Mental health care equity and access: A group therapy solution. Am Psychol. 2023;78(2):119-133. doi: 10.1037/amp0001078

 

  1. Toledano-Toledano F, Luna D, Moral de la Rubia J, et al. Psychosocial factors predicting resilience in family caregivers of children with cancer: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):748. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020748

 

  1. Lipinski S, Boegl K, Blanke ES, Suenkel U, Dziobek I. A blind spot in mental healthcare? Psychotherapists lack education and expertise for the support of adults on the autism spectrum. Autism. 2022;26(6):1509-1521. doi: 10.1177/13623613211057973

 

  1. Desjardins L, Barrera M, Schulte F, et al. Predicting social withdrawal, anxiety and depression symptoms in pediatric brain tumor survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019;37(1):22-36. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1535531

 

  1. Cangelosi G, Acito M, Grappasonni I, et al. Yoga or mindfulness on diabetes: Scoping review for theoretical experimental framework. Ann Ig. 2024;36:153-168. doi: 10.7416/ai.2024.2600

 

  1. Salamanca-Balen N, Merluzzi TV, Chen M. The effectiveness of hope-fostering interventions in palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Palliat Med. 2021;35(4):710-728. doi: 10.1177/0269216321994728

 

  1. Kim SC, Shah DV, Namkoong K, McTavish FM, Gustafson DH. Predictors of online health information seeking among women with breast cancer: The role of social support perception and emotional well-being. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2013;18(2):212-232. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12002

 

  1. Jørgensen K, Rendtorff JD. Patient participation in mental health care-perspectives of healthcare professionals: An integrative review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018;32(2):490-501. doi: 10.1111/scs.12531

 

  1. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) the TRIPOD statement. Circulation. 2015;131(2):211-219.

 

  1. Leal-Costa C, Tirado-González S, Rodríguez-Marín J, Vander-Hofstadt-Román CJ. Psychometric properties of the health professionals communication skills scale (HP-CSS). Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016;16(1):76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.04.001

 

  1. Gori A, Topino E, Brugnera A, Compare A. Assessment of professional self‐efficacy in psychological interventions and psychotherapy sessions: Development of the Therapist Self‐Efficacy Scale (T‐SES) and its application for eTherapy. J Clin Psychol. 2022;78:2122-2144. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23391

 

  1. Aldrup K, Carstensen B, Klusmann U. Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher-student interactions and student outcomes. Educ Psychol Rev. 2022;34(3):1177-1216.

 

  1. Bialystok L, Kukar P. Authenticity and empathy in education. Theor Res Educ. 2018;16:23-39. doi: 10.1177/1477878517746647

 

  1. Heinonen E, Nissen-Lie HA. The professional and personal characteristics of effective psychotherapists: A systematic review. Psychother Res. 2020;30(4):417-432. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1620366

 

  1. Wang S, Wang X, Liu X, Zhao C, Duan J. Moderating effects of humanistic care and socioeconomic status on the relationship among pain intensity, psychological factors, and psychological function in adults with cancer pain from a province of China: A cross-sectional study. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:928727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.928727

 

  1. Sharma NP, Gupta V. Therapeutic communication. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/ NBK559103/

 

  1. Purgato M, Gastaldon C, Papola D, van Ommeren M, Barbui C, Tol WA. Psychological therapies for the treatment of mental disorders in lowe relationship among pain in affected by humanitarian crises. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(7):CD011849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2

 

  1. Ravasco P. Nutrition in cancer patients. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8):1211. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081211

 

  1. Sakellaropoulos T, Vougas K, Narang S, et al. A deep learning framework for predicting response to therapy in cancer. Cell Rep. 2019;29(11):3367-3373.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.017

 

  1. Teo I, Krishnan A, Lee GL. Psychosocial interventions for advanced cancer patients: A systematic review. Psychooncology. 2019;28(7):1394-1407. doi: 10.1002/pon.5103

 

  1. Alowais SA, Huang IW. Revolutionizing healthcare: The role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. Angle Health Law Rev. 2024(94):95-132.
Share
Back to top
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, Electronic ISSN: 2587-196X Print ISSN: 2587-2400, Published by AccScience Publishing
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here
Accept