AccScience Publishing / EER / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/EER026320034
Cite this article
8
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
REVIEW ARTICLE

Sustainable soil governance pathways toward zero food gap

Rafat Ramadan Ali1*
Show Less
1 Soils and Water Use Department, National Research Centre, Giza , Egypt
Received: 4 August 2026 | Revised: 16 August 2026 | Accepted: 18 August 2026 | Published online: 7 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Achieving zero food gap has become a strategic global priority in response to increasing pressures from population growth, land degradation, climate change, and resource scarcity. Despite substantial advances in agricultural technologies, persistent disparities between food demand and production highlight the need for integrated approaches that strengthen the natural resource base while improving decision-making and policy implementation. Among these resources, healthy soils constitute the foundation of sustainable food systems, making sustainable soil governance the essential first step toward resilient food production. This review synthesizes recent advances in soil science, Earth observation, artificial intelligence, and decision support systems to develop an integrated conceptual framework—Sustainable Soil Governance Pathways Toward Zero Food Gap. Following the PRISMA 2020 framework, peer-reviewed literature published between 2015 and 2026 was systematically analyzed and organized into four interconnected domains: sustainable soil management, digital soil intelligence, sustainable soil governance, and enabling societal drivers. Rather than treating these domains independently, the review emphasizes their interactions in transforming scientific evidence into coordinated management and policy actions. The proposed framework identifies sustainable soil governance as the central coordinating mechanism that links healthy soils to digital innovation, evidence-based decision-making, and broader environmental, institutional, and socioeconomic conditions influencing food systems. This perspective recognizes that while soil governance is not the sole determinant of food security, it provides the foundation for integrating complementary interventions to advance the long-term vision of zero food gap. The framework offers a practical roadmap for supporting resilient, productive, and sustainable food systems.

Keywords
Soil governance
Zero food gap
Soil health
Earth observation
Artificial intelligence
Food security
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Falcon WP, Naylor RL, Shankar ND. Rethinking global food demand for 2050. Popul Dev Rev. 2022;48(4):921-957. doi: 10.1111/padr.12508
  2. van Dijk M, Morley T, Rau ML, Saghai Y. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nat Food. 2021;2(7):494-501. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9
  3. Amundson R, Berhe AA, Hopmans JW, Olson C, Sztein AE, Sparks DL. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science. 2015;348(6235):1261071. doi: 10.1126/science.1261071
  4. le Maire G, Marsden C, Nouvellon Y, et al. MODIS NDVI time-series allow the monitoring of Eucalyptus plantation biomass. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115(10):2613-2625. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.017
  5. Odebiri O, Mutanga O, Odindi J. Deep learning-based national scale soil organic carbon mapping with Sentinel-3 data. Geoderma. 2022;411:115695. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115695
  6. Hou D, Bolan NS, Tsang DCW, Kirkham MB, O’Connor D. Sustainable soil use and management: an interdisciplinary and systematic approach. Sci Total Environ. 2020;729:138961. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138961
  7. Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan. 2007;81(3):167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
  8. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
  9. Hou D. Soil health and ecosystem services. Soil Use Manag. 2023;39(4):1259-1266. doi: 10.1111/sum.12945
  10. Bünemann EK, Bongiorno G, Bai Z, et al. Soil quality—a critical review. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;120:105-125. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030
  11. Cadel M, Cousin I, Therond O. Relationships between soil ecosystem services in temperate annual field crops: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ. 2023;902:165930. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165930
  12. Banerjee S, van der Heijden MGA. Soil microbiomes and one health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21(1):6-20. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00779-w
  13. Schjønning P, van den Akker JJH, Keller T, et al. Driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) analysis and risk assessment for soil compaction: a European perspective. Adv Agron. 2015;133:183-237. doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2015.06.001
  14. Panagos P, Vieira D, Eekhout JPC, et al. How the EU Soil Observatory contributes to a stronger soil erosion community. Environ Res. 2024;248:118319. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118319
  15. Hassani A, Azapagic A, Shokri N. Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing climate in the 21st century. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6663. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26907-3
  16. Guerra CA, Bardgett RD, Caon L, et al. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity. Science. 2021;371(6526):239-241. doi: 10.1126/science.abd7926
  17. Lal R. Regenerative agriculture for food and climate. J Soil Water Conserv. 2020;75(5):123A-124A. doi: 10.2489/jswc.2020.0620A
  18. Newton P, Civita N, Frankel-Goldwater L, Bartel K, Johns C. What is regenerative agriculture? A review of scholar and practitioner definitions based on processes and outcomes. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;4:577723. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.577723
  19. Schreefel L, Schulte RPO, de Boer IJM, Schrijver AP, van Zanten HHE. Regenerative agriculture - the soil is the base. Glob Food Secur. 2020;26:100404. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404
  20. Khangura R, Ferris D, Wagg C, Bowyer J. Regenerative agriculture—a literature review on the practices and mechanisms used to improve soil health. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2338. doi: 10.3390/su15032338
  21. Rehberger E, West PC, Spillane C, McKeown PC. What climate and environmental benefits of regenerative agriculture practices? An evidence review. Environ Res Commun. 2023;5(5):052001. doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/acd6dc
  22. Wiesmeier M, Urbanski L, Hobley E, et al. Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils—a review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma. 2019;333(5):149-162. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.026
  23. Joseph S, Cowie AL, Van Zwieten L, et al. How biochar works, and when it does not: a review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenergy. 2021;13(11):1731-1764. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12885
  24. Vanlauwe B, Bationo A, Chianu J, et al. Integrated soil fertility management: operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outlook Agric. 2010;39(1):17-24. doi: 10.5367/000000010791169998
  25. Chazdon RL, Brancalion PHS, Lamb D, Laestadius L, Calmon M, Kumar C. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv Lett. 2017;10(1):125-132. doi: 10.1111/conl.12220
  26. Syromiatnykov Y, Mamatov F, Sholoiko A, et al. Geometry-optimized strip tillage for improving soil physical quality and hydraulic function in semi-arid vineyards. Agriculture. 2026;16(7):751. doi: 10.3390/agriculture16070751
  27. Syromyatnikov Y, Troyanovskaya I, Zagidullin R, Tikhonov E, Orekhovskaya A, Voinash S. Soil density in traditional mouldboard tillage. Acta Technol Agric. 2023;26(3):159-165. doi: 10.2478/ata-2023-0021
  28. Pashchenko VF, Syromyatnikov YUN, Hramov NS, Vojnash SA. The influence of local loosening of the soil on soybean productivity. Tractors Agric Mach. 2019;86(5):79-86. doi: 10.31992/0321-4443-2019-5-79-86
  29. Syromiatnykov Y. Sustainable soybean cultivation using nitrogen-fixing bacteria and humic products derived from agricultural waste: a review. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2025;22(6):1-20. doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025230190
  30. Syromiatnykov Y, Mamatov F, Fayzullaev K, et al. Optimization of Leveler-Compactor parameters in combined strip tillage for soil preparation under plastic film for melon crops. Agronomy. 2026;16(8):809. doi: 10.3390/agronomy16080809
  31. Wadoux AMJC, Minasny B, McBratney AB. Machine learning for digital soil mapping: applications, challenges and suggested solutions. Earth Sci Rev. 2020;210:103359. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103359
  32. Padarian J, Minasny B, McBratney AB. Using deep learning for digital soil mapping. SOIL. 2019;5(1):79-89. doi: 10.5194/soil-5-79-2019
  33. Peng J, Albergel C, Balenzano A, et al. A roadmap for high-resolution satellite soil moisture applications: confronting product characteristics with user requirements. Remote Sens Environ. 2021;252:112162. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112162
  34. Arrouays D, Poggio L, Mulder VL, Salazar O. Digital soil mapping and GlobalSoilMap—scientific advances and the operational use of digital soil mapping to address global environmental challenges. Geoderma Reg. 2021;26:e00414. doi: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00414
  35. Poggio L, de Sousa LM, Batjes NH, et al. SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. SOIL. 2021;7(1):217-240. doi: 10.5194/soil-7-217-2021
  36. Lamichhane S, Kumar L, Wilson B. Digital soil mapping algorithms and covariates for soil organic carbon mapping and their implications: a review. Geoderma. 2019;352:395-413. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.031
  37. Chen S, Arrouays D, Mulder VL, et al. Digital mapping of GlobalSoilMap soil properties at a broad scale: a review. Geoderma. 2022;409:115567. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115567
  38. van der Westhuizen S, Heuvelink GBM, Hofmeyr DP. Multivariate random forest for digital soil mapping. Geoderma. 2023;431:116365. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116365
  39. Li Q, Zhang C, Shangguan W, Li L, Dai Y. A novel local-global dependency deep learning model for soil mapping. Geoderma. 2023;438:116649. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116649
  40. Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ. 2017;202:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
  41. Tamiminia H, Salehi B, Mahdianpari M, Quackenbush L, Adeli S, Brisco B. Google Earth Engine for geo-big data applications: A meta-analysis and systematic review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2020;164:152-170. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.001
  42. Piikki K, Wetterlind J, Söderström M, Stenberg B. Perspectives on validation in digital soil mapping of continuous attributes—a review. Soil Use Manag. 2021;37(1):7-21. doi: 10.1111/sum.12694
  43. Walling E, Vaneeckhaute C. Developing successful environmental decision support systems: challenges and best practices. J Environ Manag. 2020;264:110513. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110513
  44. Zhai Z, Martínez JF, Beltran V, Martínez NL. Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: survey and challenges. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;170:105256. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105256
  45. Arrouays D, McBratney A, Bouma J, et al. Impressions of digital soil maps: the good, the not so good, and making them ever better. Geoderma Reg. 2020;20:e00255. doi: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00255
  46. Colapinto C, Jayaraman R, Ben Abdelaziz F, La Torre D. Environmental sustainability and multifaceted development: multi-criteria decision models with applications. Ann Oper Res. 2020;293(2):405-432. doi: 10.1007/s10479-019-03403-y
  47. Rivera-Marin D, Dash J, Ogutu B. The use of remote sensing for desertification studies: a review. J Arid Environ. 2022;206(2):104829. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104829
  48. Liu J, Li M, Jafari Shalamzari M, et al. A remote sensing-based early warning system for desertification: monitoring spatiotemporal dynamics and identifying risk zones. Land Degrad Dev. 2026;37(11):6496-6515. doi: 10.1002/ldr.70529
  49. Peake LR, Robb C. Saving the ground beneath our feet: establishing priorities and criteria for governing soil use and protection. R Soc Open Sci. 2021;8(11):201994. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201994
  50. Bodle R. International soil governance. Soil Secur. 2022;6:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100037
  51. Ginzky H, Ruppel OC. Soil protection law in Africa: insights and recommendations based on country studies from Cameroon, Kenya and Zambia. Soil Secur. 2022;6:100032. doi: 10.1016/j.soisec.2021.100032
  52. Eugenio NR, Ginzky H, Heuser IL, Hannam I, Ruppel OC, Sambo PT. Foreword of the second special issue on “Soil Governance.” Soil Secur. 2024;16:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100138
  53. Bouma J, Montanarella L. Facing policy challenges with inter- and transdisciplinary soil research focused on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. SOIL. 2016;2(2):135-145. doi: 10.5194/soil-2-135-2016
  54. Peake LR, Robb C. The global standard bearers of soil governance. Soil Secur. 2022;6:100055. doi: 10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100055
  55. Sanchez-Garcia C, Button E, Wynne-Jones S, Porter H, Rugg I, Hannam JA. Finding common ground: co-producing national soil policy in Wales through academic and government collaboration. Soil Secur. 2023;11:100095. doi: 10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100095
  56. Helming K, Daedlow K, Hansjürgens B, Koellner T. Assessment and governance of sustainable soil management. Sustainability. 2018;10(12):4432. doi: 10.3390/su10124432
  57. Ginzky H. Soil governance: the case of implementation and enforcement. Soil Secur. 2022;6:100040. doi: 10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100040
  58. Sharififar A, Borrelli P, Evangelista SJ, et al. Soil policy principles and a policymaking framework using the soil security concept. Environ Sci Policy. 2025;168:104057. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104057
  59. Ovienmhada U, Mouftaou F, Wood D. Inclusive design of Earth observation decision support systems for environmental governance: a case study of Lake Nokoué. Front Clim. 2021;3:717418. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2021.717418
  60. Gebreegziabher T, Suryabhagavan KV, Raghuvanshi TK. WebGIS-based decision support system for soil erosion assessment in Legedadi watershed, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Geol Ecol Landsc. 2023;7(2):97-114. doi: 10.1080/24749508.2021.1924441
  61. Cinelli M, Kadziński M, Miebs G, Gonzalez M, Słowiński R. Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system. Eur J Oper Res. 2022;302(2):633-651. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.011
  62. Kandakoglu A, Frini A, Ben Amor S. Multicriteria decision making for sustainable development: a systematic review. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal. 2019;26(5-6):202-251. doi: 10.1002/mcda.1682
  63. Purcell W, Neubauer T. Digital twins in agriculture: a state-of-the-art review. Smart Agric Technol. 2023;3:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2022.100094
  64. Ortiz-Bobea A, Ault TR, Carrillo CM, Chambers RG, Lobell DB. Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth. Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11(4):306-312. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1
  65. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2023. doi: 10.1017/9781009325844
  66. Wheeler T, von Braun J. Climate change impacts on global food security. Science. 2013;341(6145):508-513. doi: 10.1126/science.1239402
  67. Lobell DB, Gourdji SM. The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(4):1686-1697. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.208298
  68. Oldfield EE, Bradford MA, Wood SA. Global meta-analysis of the relationship between soil organic matter and crop yields. SOIL. 2019;5(1):15-32. doi: 10.5194/soil-5-15-2019
  69. Emde D, Hannam KD, Most I, Nelson LM, Jones MD. Soil organic carbon in irrigated agricultural systems: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol. 2021;27(16):3898-3910. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15680
  70. Seddon N. Harnessing the potential of nature-based solutions for mitigating and adapting to climate change. Science. 2022;376(6600):1410-1416. doi: 10.1126/science.abn9668
  71. Turner B, Devisscher T, Chabaneix N, Woroniecki S, Messier C, Seddon N. The role of nature-based solutions in supporting social-ecological resilience for climate change adaptation. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2022;47:123-148. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010017
  72. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci Adv. 2016;2(2). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500323
  73. Rosa L, Chiarelli DD, Rulli MC, Dell’Angelo J, D’Odorico P. Global agricultural economic water scarcity. Sci Adv. 2020;6(18). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6031
  74. Jägermeyr J, Pastor A, Biemans H, Gerten D. Reconciling irrigated food production with environmental flows for sustainable development goals implementation. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):15900. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15900
  75. Corona-López E, Román-Gutiérrez AD, Otazo-Sánchez EM, Guzmán-Ortiz FA, Acevedo-Sandoval QA. Water-food nexus assessment in agriculture: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4983. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094983
  76. Talaviya T, Shah D, Patel N, Yagnik H, Shah M. Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides. Artif Intell Agric. 2020;4:58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.002
  77. Gorguner M, Kavvas ML. Modeling impacts of future climate change on reservoir storages and irrigation water demands in a Mediterranean basin. Sci Total Environ. 2020;748:141246. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141246
  78. Wahbeh S, Anastasiadis F, Sundarakani B, Manikas I. Exploration of food security challenges towards more sustainable food production: a systematic literature review of the major drivers and policies. Foods. 2022;11(23):3804. doi: 10.3390/foods11233804
  79. Pretty J, Benton TG, Bharucha ZP, et al. Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nat Sustain. 2018;1(8):441-446. doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0
  80. Webb P, Benton TG, Beddington J, Flynn D, Kelly NM, Thomas SM. The urgency of food system transformation is now irrefutable. Nat Food. 2020;1(10):584-585. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00161-0
  81. Giller KE, Delaune T, Silva JV, et al. The future of farming: who will produce our food? Food Secur. 2021;13(5):1073-1099. doi: 10.1007/s12571-021-01184-6
  82. Birner R, Daum T, Pray C. Who drives the digital revolution in agriculture? A review of supply-side trends, players and challenges. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2021;43(4):1260-1285. doi: 10.1002/aepp.13145
  83. Zougmoré RB, Läderach P, Campbell BM. Transforming food systems in Africa under climate change pressure: role of climate-smart agriculture. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4305. doi: 10.3390/su13084305
  84. Melesse MB, van den Berg M, Béné C, de Brauw A, Brouwer ID. Metrics to analyze and improve diets through food systems in low and middle income countries. Food Secur. 2020;12(5):1085-1105. doi: 10.1007/s12571-020-01091-2
  85. Barbosa Junior M, Pinheiro E, Sokulski CC, Ramos Huarachi DA, de Francisco AC. How to identify barriers to the adoption of sustainable agriculture? A study based on a multi-criteria model. Sustainability. 2022;14(20):13277. doi: 10.3390/su142013277
  86. Klerkx L, Rose D. Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: how do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Glob Food Secur. 2020;24:100347. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347
  87. Fabregas R, Kremer M, Schilbach F. Realizing the potential of digital development: the case of agricultural advice. Science. 2019;366(6471). doi: 10.1126/science.aay3038
  88. Doss C. Women and agricultural productivity: reframing the issues. Dev Policy Rev. 2018;36(1):35-50. doi: 10.1111/dpr.12243
  89. Piñeiro V, Arias J, Dürr J, et al. A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes. Nat Sustain. 2020;3(10):809-820. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y
Share
Back to top
Explora: Environment and Resource, Electronic ISSN: 3060-9046 Published by AccScience Publishing